PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.52%
Some net income increase while FSM is negative at -26.39%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.56%
D&A growth of 0.56% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
100.00%
Well above FSM's 51.36% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
121.90%
Well above FSM's 64.08% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.90%
Some yoy usage while FSM is negative at -232.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-24.21%
Both negative yoy, with FSM at -220.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
5.55%
Some CFO growth while FSM is negative at -46.74%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.86%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSM stands at 27.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.86%
We reduce yoy invests while FSM stands at 146.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.29%
Issuance growth of 8.29% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.