95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.35%
Negative net income growth while FSM stands at 150.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
15.76%
D&A growth well above FSM's 26.36%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-205.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSM stands at 253.72%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
26.13%
SBC growth of 26.13% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
71.22%
Slight usage while FSM is negative at -204.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above FSM's 123.84%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2500.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSM at -296.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
26.13%
Some yoy increase while FSM is negative at -114.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-6.87%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSM at -3.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.81%
Purchases growth of 58.81% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30466.32%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1684.43%
We reduce yoy invests while FSM stands at 12.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.01%
We slightly raise equity while FSM is negative at -77.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.