95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.33%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 12.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
13.29%
D&A growth of 13.29% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-342.07%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSM stands at 27.88%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-35.10%
Negative yoy SBC while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
12.04%
Less working capital growth vs. FSM's 140.58%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth well above FSM's 105.16%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while FSM is negative at -101.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
Lower AP growth vs. FSM's 387.25%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSM at -1850.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
92.91%
Some yoy increase while FSM is negative at -32.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.30%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of FSM's 28.67%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while FSM is negative at -70.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1640.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -998.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5926.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -402.14%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1645.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -3200.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.