95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.19%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FSM's 29.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
25.94%
Some D&A expansion while FSM is negative at -693.67%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
189.32%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FSM's 1266.67%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
44.54%
Less SBC growth vs. FSM's 244.35%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
78.15%
Less working capital growth vs. FSM's 513.03%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
19.73%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. FSM's 69.83%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
96.72%
Inventory growth well above FSM's 1.32%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
12.50%
AP growth of 12.50% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-169.29%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 410.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
3888.06%
Well above FSM's 1462.46%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
32.30%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of FSM's 38.15%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
85.96%
Some CapEx rise while FSM is negative at -79.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FSM is 1.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-212.50%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSM is 69.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-165.87%
We reduce yoy invests while FSM stands at 51.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.