PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.72%
Some net income increase while FSM is negative at -93.88%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
66.29%
Less D&A growth vs. FSM's 149.28%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-104.43%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-72.78%
Negative yoy SBC while FSM is 38.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
854.67%
Slight usage while FSM is negative at -150.95%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-85.24%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSM at -1406.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.23%
A yoy AP increase while FSM is negative at -138.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-3700.00%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 445.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-95.51%
Negative yoy while FSM is 197.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
22.62%
Some CFO growth while FSM is negative at -40.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
99.88%
Some CapEx rise while FSM is negative at -75.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-117.38%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSM is 18.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
99.43%
We have mild expansions while FSM is negative at -420.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
91.50%
Debt repayment growth of 91.50% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -14.47%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.