PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.54%
Some net income increase while FSM is negative at -38.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.18%
Less D&A growth vs. FSM's 838.86%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-76.49%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-649.14%
Negative yoy SBC while FSM is 83.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-295.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSM is 52.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3131.59%
AR is negative yoy while FSM is 100.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.24%
A yoy AP increase while FSM is negative at -102.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-1616.70%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 57.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-919.60%
Both negative yoy, with FSM at -12.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-6.78%
Negative yoy CFO while FSM is 39.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
58.29%
Some CapEx rise while FSM is negative at -17.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.58%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-101.56%
We reduce yoy sales while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-188.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -356.45%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-56.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -993.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.91%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FSM's 1.60%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-86.06%
Negative yoy issuance while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.