PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSM at -98.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-21.66%
Negative yoy D&A while FSM is 213.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
148.87%
Some yoy growth while FSM is negative at -26.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
146.24%
SBC growth well above FSM's 76.16%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
156.82%
Well above FSM's 108.75% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
137.26%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. FSM's 4965.62%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.44%
Lower AP growth vs. FSM's 2325.54%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
202.40%
Some yoy usage while FSM is negative at -39.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
166.77%
Well above FSM's 84.29%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-6.99%
Negative yoy CFO while FSM is 33.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
97.21%
Some CapEx rise while FSM is negative at -169.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
138.24%
Liquidation growth of 138.24% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
84.20%
Growth well above FSM's 102.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
89.72%
Investing outflow well above FSM's 76.50%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-13.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -69.83%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-68.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.