PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.79%
Some net income increase while FSM is negative at -345.74%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-15.06%
Negative yoy D&A while FSM is 9.13%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
5873.13%
Some yoy growth while FSM is negative at -57.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
99.48%
SBC growth while FSM is negative at -5.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-35.80%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSM is 819.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-84.06%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSM at -58.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
123.20%
Some inventory rise while FSM is negative at -75.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
170.90%
AP growth well above FSM's 165.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
150.68%
Some yoy usage while FSM is negative at -178.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-41373.38%
Negative yoy while FSM is 170.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-25.13%
Negative yoy CFO while FSM is 36.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-205.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -9.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.44%
Purchases growth of 61.44% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5417.49%
Growth well above FSM's 130.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-161.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -1.46%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
0.50%
We repay more while FSM is negative at -574.31%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-96.55%
Negative yoy issuance while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.