PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.74%
Some net income increase while FSM is negative at -407.18%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
55.61%
D&A growth well above FSM's 9.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-167.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
50.53%
Less SBC growth vs. FSM's 1519.48%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
680.22%
Well above FSM's 253.79% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.57%
AR growth while FSM is negative at -1059.76%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-364.99%
Negative yoy inventory while FSM is 106.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-41.31%
Negative yoy AP while FSM is 229.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2108.31%
Some yoy usage while FSM is negative at -312.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-644.39%
Negative yoy while FSM is 8885.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.89%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-396.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -43.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-152781.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -989.53%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
12.62%
Purchases growth of 12.62% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
35189753.73%
Liquidation growth of 35189753.73% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-165.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -2.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-379.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -55.25%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
15.38%
We repay more while FSM is negative at -2.97%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
2091.46%
Issuance growth of 2091.46% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
267.80%
Buyback growth of 267.80% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.