PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
37.61%
Net income growth above 1.5x GFI's 20.26%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-1.54%
Negative yoy D&A while GFI is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-332.84%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
290.50%
SBC growth while GFI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
581.84%
Well above GFI's 167.98% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
190.63%
AR growth well above GFI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.46%
Negative yoy AP while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
140.55%
Growth of 140.55% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
315.58%
Some yoy increase while GFI is negative at -109.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
20.34%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of GFI's 27.35%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-38886.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -19.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-132.61%
We reduce yoy other investing while GFI is 91.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-38037.27%
We reduce yoy invests while GFI stands at 68.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
78.80%
Debt repayment growth of 78.80% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.