PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 264.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.33%
Negative yoy D&A while GFI is 25.50%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-14030.23%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-87.74%
Negative yoy SBC while GFI is 16.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GFI at -616.06%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
134.82%
AR growth of 134.82% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. GFI's 200.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-202.13%
Both negative yoy, with GFI at -198.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.83%
Negative yoy CFO while GFI is 27.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
64.30%
Some CapEx rise while GFI is negative at -44.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
129.23%
Liquidation growth of 129.23% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
69.70%
Growth well above GFI's 11.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
200.22%
We have mild expansions while GFI is negative at -41.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-91.19%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.