PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.77%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-21.66%
Negative yoy D&A while GFI is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
148.87%
Deferred tax of 148.87% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
146.24%
SBC growth while GFI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
156.82%
Well above GFI's 167.98% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
137.26%
AR growth well above GFI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.44%
AP growth of 208.44% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
202.40%
Growth of 202.40% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
166.77%
Some yoy increase while GFI is negative at -109.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-6.99%
Negative yoy CFO while GFI is 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
97.21%
Some CapEx rise while GFI is negative at -19.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
138.24%
Liquidation growth of 138.24% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
84.20%
Growth well above GFI's 91.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
89.72%
Investing outflow well above GFI's 68.33%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-13.29%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-68.20%
Negative yoy issuance while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.