95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.38%
Negative yoy D&A while GFI is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-2.19%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
79.42%
SBC growth while GFI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-482.86%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GFI is 167.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1119.88%
AR is negative yoy while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
117.96%
Inventory growth well above GFI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-231.38%
Negative yoy AP while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
14.21%
Growth of 14.21% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
100.39%
Some yoy increase while GFI is negative at -109.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
7.81%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of GFI's 27.35%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
84.87%
Some CapEx rise while GFI is negative at -19.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
181.48%
Growth well above GFI's 91.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
76.94%
Investing outflow well above GFI's 68.33%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
164.26%
Issuance growth of 164.26% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.