95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 26.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
14.34%
Some D&A expansion while GFI is negative at -12.06%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-70.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-268.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GFI at -34.92%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
146.27%
Well above GFI's 110.90% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
186.50%
AR growth while GFI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-274.44%
Negative yoy inventory while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
5.27%
AP growth of 5.27% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-33.05%
Negative yoy usage while GFI is 911.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-55.38%
Both negative yoy, with GFI at -133.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-1.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GFI at -3.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
66.20%
CapEx growth well above GFI's 12.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.92%
Purchases growth of 86.92% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -136.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
72.51%
Investing outflow well above GFI's 8.25%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-69.57%
Negative yoy issuance while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.