PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.98%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 114.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.16%
Some D&A expansion while GFI is negative at -15.23%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
193.24%
Well above GFI's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-39.38%
Negative yoy SBC while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
181.32%
Slight usage while GFI is negative at -5.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
151.10%
AR growth of 151.10% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-70.23%
Negative yoy inventory while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
113.08%
AP growth of 113.08% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1069.64%
Negative yoy usage while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
111.57%
Some yoy increase while GFI is negative at -38.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
49.79%
Some CFO growth while GFI is negative at -22.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-174.62%
Negative yoy CapEx while GFI is 13.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.62%
Purchases well above GFI's 22.79%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -2015.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-3.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -32.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
12.38%
We repay more while GFI is negative at -71.49%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-88.06%
Negative yoy issuance while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.