PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.73%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-5.58%
Negative yoy D&A while GFI is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-16.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.30%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GFI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-129.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GFI is 167.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-266.58%
AR is negative yoy while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
172.76%
Inventory growth well above GFI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
440.48%
AP growth of 440.48% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
110.07%
Growth of 110.07% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-44.47%
Both negative yoy, with GFI at -109.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-15.45%
Negative yoy CFO while GFI is 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-6.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -19.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while GFI stands at 100.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16048.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.07%
We reduce yoy sales while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
157.57%
Growth well above GFI's 91.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-133.09%
We reduce yoy invests while GFI stands at 68.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
4.52%
Debt repayment growth of 4.52% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-92.39%
Negative yoy issuance while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
92.39%
Buyback growth of 92.39% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.