PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.74%
Some net income increase while GFI is negative at -41.52%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
55.61%
Some D&A expansion while GFI is negative at -8.52%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-167.85%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
50.53%
SBC growth while GFI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
680.22%
Well above GFI's 73.45% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.57%
AR growth of 109.57% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-364.99%
Negative yoy inventory while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-41.31%
Negative yoy AP while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2108.31%
Growth well above GFI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-644.39%
Negative yoy while GFI is 16.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GFI's 18.27%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-396.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -10.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-152781.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -5065.44%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
12.62%
Some yoy expansion while GFI is negative at -43.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
35189753.73%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x GFI's 137.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-165.36%
We reduce yoy other investing while GFI is 193.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-379.21%
We reduce yoy invests while GFI stands at 20.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
15.38%
Debt repayment well below GFI's 75.77%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
2091.46%
Issuance growth of 2091.46% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
267.80%
Buyback growth of 267.80% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.