PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.65%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.99%
Negative yoy D&A while GFI is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
97.55%
Deferred tax of 97.55% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-80.37%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GFI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-24.39%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GFI is 167.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
1201.96%
AR growth well above GFI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above GFI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-284.77%
Negative yoy AP while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-84.71%
Negative yoy usage while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
8917.28%
Some yoy increase while GFI is negative at -109.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-11.81%
Negative yoy CFO while GFI is 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.80%
Some CapEx rise while GFI is negative at -19.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above GFI's 100.10%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
82.91%
Purchases growth of 82.91% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-30.43%
We reduce yoy other investing while GFI is 91.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
2.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. GFI's 68.33%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-3.50%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
103.42%
Issuance growth of 103.42% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.