95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.16%
Some net income increase while KGC is negative at -76.47%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.22%
D&A growth well above KGC's 1.15%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
262.53%
Some yoy growth while KGC is negative at -41.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-125.20%
Both cut yoy SBC, with KGC at -13.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
77.19%
Less working capital growth vs. KGC's 199.04%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-314.48%
AR is negative yoy while KGC is 2550.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.47%
AP growth of 236.47% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-244.79%
Negative yoy usage while KGC is 568.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-132.63%
Negative yoy while KGC is 1094.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
18.03%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of KGC's 47.27%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-648.91%
Negative yoy CapEx while KGC is 18.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.99%
We have some outflow growth while KGC is negative at -25.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-125.59%
We reduce yoy invests while KGC stands at 87.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-600.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.