PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.43%
Some net income increase while KGC is negative at -76.31%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-6.50%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with KGC at -6.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-813.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while KGC stands at 68.70%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
64.04%
SBC growth of 64.04% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
36.56%
Less working capital growth vs. KGC's 306.88%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
46.26%
AR growth while KGC is negative at -114.14%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.75%
AP growth of 53.75% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1330.88%
Negative yoy usage while KGC is 176.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
109.88%
Well above KGC's 17.86%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
3.97%
Some CFO growth while KGC is negative at -13.52%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
98.29%
Some CapEx rise while KGC is negative at -12.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -112.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-130.77%
We reduce yoy invests while KGC stands at 135.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
13.95%
Debt repayment growth of 13.95% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.