95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with KGC at -5114.29%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.58%
Less D&A growth vs. KGC's 7.57%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
127.08%
Some yoy growth while KGC is negative at -50.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-72.04%
Negative yoy SBC while KGC is 5.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
266.55%
Well above KGC's 151.88% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
223.37%
AR growth while KGC is negative at -77.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.73%
Negative yoy AP while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
144.39%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. KGC's 802.78%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
101.73%
Well above KGC's 167.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-19.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with KGC at -31.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.94%
Some CapEx rise while KGC is negative at -11.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-377.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-377.07%
Negative yoy purchasing while KGC stands at 62.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-79.34%
We reduce yoy sales while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
108.52%
We have some outflow growth while KGC is negative at -107.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-21.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -106.22%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
64.56%
Debt repayment growth of 64.56% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.