PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.92%
Some net income increase while KGC is negative at -14.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.19%
Some D&A expansion while KGC is negative at -1.67%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
0.25%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. KGC's 163.79%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
177.90%
SBC growth well above KGC's 10.00%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-55.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -48.44%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-509.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with KGC at -89.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. KGC's 132.51%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-101.84%
Both negative yoy, with KGC at -189.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
30.24%
Some CFO growth while KGC is negative at -30.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while KGC is 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases well above KGC's 89.83%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
70800.00%
Liquidation growth of 70800.00% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
16528.30%
Growth well above KGC's 13.64%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
1431.96%
Investing outflow well above KGC's 5.99%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
6.80%
We repay more while KGC is negative at -17.04%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.