95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.54%
Some net income increase while KGC is negative at -20.64%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.18%
Less D&A growth vs. KGC's 9.08%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-76.49%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-649.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with KGC at -42.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-295.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while KGC is 1156.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3131.59%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with KGC at -276.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.24%
Lower AP growth vs. KGC's 810.93%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-1616.70%
Negative yoy usage while KGC is 828.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-919.60%
Negative yoy while KGC is 92.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-6.78%
Negative yoy CFO while KGC is 38.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
58.29%
CapEx growth well above KGC's 6.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -411.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-101.56%
We reduce yoy sales while KGC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-188.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -99.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-56.08%
We reduce yoy invests while KGC stands at 38.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.91%
We repay more while KGC is negative at -6584.21%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-86.06%
Negative yoy issuance while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.