95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.33%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with KGC at -111.56%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
14.34%
Some D&A expansion while KGC is negative at -0.17%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-70.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while KGC stands at 174.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-268.04%
Negative yoy SBC while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
146.27%
Well above KGC's 141.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
186.50%
AR growth while KGC is negative at -67.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-274.44%
Negative yoy inventory while KGC is 30.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
5.27%
Lower AP growth vs. KGC's 395.77%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-33.05%
Negative yoy usage while KGC is 113.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-55.38%
Both negative yoy, with KGC at -148.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-1.99%
Negative yoy CFO while KGC is 5.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
66.20%
Some CapEx rise while KGC is negative at -32.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.92%
Some yoy expansion while KGC is negative at -45.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while KGC is 2422.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
72.51%
Investing outflow well above KGC's 108.45%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -2227.78%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-69.57%
Negative yoy issuance while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.