95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.98%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 66.92%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.16%
D&A growth well above KGC's 11.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
193.24%
Well above KGC's 7.78% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-39.38%
Negative yoy SBC while KGC is 233.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
181.32%
Less working capital growth vs. KGC's 422.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
151.10%
AR growth well above KGC's 111.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-70.23%
Negative yoy inventory while KGC is 7.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
113.08%
Lower AP growth vs. KGC's 1693.77%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-1069.64%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -282533.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
111.57%
Well above KGC's 178.75%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
49.79%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of KGC's 104.09%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-174.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -11.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.62%
Purchases growth of 99.62% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.11%
We reduce yoy other investing while KGC is 62.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-3.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -7.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
12.38%
We repay more while KGC is negative at -1355.48%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-88.06%
Negative yoy issuance while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.