PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.73%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with KGC at -27.83%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-5.58%
Negative yoy D&A while KGC is 5.15%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-16.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while KGC stands at 663.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.30%
Negative yoy SBC while KGC is 45.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-129.02%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -149.30%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-266.58%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with KGC at -149.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
172.76%
Inventory growth well above KGC's 74.69%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
440.48%
A yoy AP increase while KGC is negative at -116.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
110.07%
Growth well above KGC's 93.77%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-44.47%
Both negative yoy, with KGC at -70.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-15.45%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with KGC at -23.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-6.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -12.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16048.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.07%
We reduce yoy sales while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
157.57%
We have some outflow growth while KGC is negative at -195.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-133.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -26.97%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
4.52%
We repay more while KGC is negative at -145.74%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-92.39%
Negative yoy issuance while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
92.39%
Buyback growth of 92.39% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.