PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.65%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 58.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.99%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with KGC at -3.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
97.55%
Some yoy growth while KGC is negative at -84.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-80.37%
Both cut yoy SBC, with KGC at -70.83%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-24.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -7.59%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
1201.96%
AR growth well above KGC's 220.35%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. KGC's 1404.35%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-284.77%
Both negative yoy AP, with KGC at -55.21%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-84.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
8917.28%
Well above KGC's 1497.18%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-11.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with KGC at -22.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.80%
Lower CapEx growth vs. KGC's 26.58%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above KGC's 87.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
82.91%
Purchases growth of 82.91% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-30.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -23.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
2.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. KGC's 29.58%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-3.50%
We cut debt repayment yoy while KGC is 98.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
103.42%
Issuance growth of 103.42% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.