95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.35%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with NEM at -3132.35%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
15.76%
Some D&A expansion while NEM is negative at -1.56%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-205.57%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
26.13%
SBC growth of 26.13% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
71.22%
Slight usage while NEM is negative at -78.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while NEM is negative at -333.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2500.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -65.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
26.13%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. NEM's 16840.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-6.87%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with NEM at -1170.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.81%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. NEM's 118.95%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30466.32%
We reduce yoy other investing while NEM is 16400.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1684.43%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 84.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.01%
We slightly raise equity while NEM is negative at -44.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.