PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.02%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 15.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-2.50%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with NEM at -8.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-900.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NEM stands at 131.58%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-55.35%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
204.75%
Well above NEM's 63.85% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above NEM's 45.45%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-163.11%
Both negative yoy, with NEM at -30.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.42%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of NEM's 31.01%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
62.15%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -75.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
5292.00%
Growth well above NEM's 184.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
140.21%
We have mild expansions while NEM is negative at -272.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to NEM's 95.09%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -99.35%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
95.53%
Buyback growth of 95.53% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.