95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.33%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -27.73%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.29%
D&A growth well above NEM's 3.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-342.07%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NEM stands at 115.69%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-35.10%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
12.04%
Less working capital growth vs. NEM's 54.91%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. NEM's 342.31%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while NEM is negative at -71.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while NEM is negative at -228.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while NEM is 45.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.91%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. NEM's 420.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
16.30%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x NEM's 5.31%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -3.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1640.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -33.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5926.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -88.89%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1645.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -12.28%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while NEM is negative at -79.49%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.