95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.36%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 29.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-32.92%
Negative yoy D&A while NEM is 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-85.55%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
25.51%
SBC growth of 25.51% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-230.54%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NEM is 34.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1258.62%
AR is negative yoy while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-175.87%
Both negative yoy AP, with NEM at -151.61%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
211.90%
Growth well above NEM's 82.06%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-575.00%
Negative yoy while NEM is 12.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-25.60%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 65.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above NEM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
100.00%
Purchases well above NEM's 75.47%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-206.82%
We reduce yoy other investing while NEM is 45.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-103909.45%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 14.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.