PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.72%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -35.37%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
66.29%
Some D&A expansion while NEM is negative at -4.50%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-104.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NEM stands at 13.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-72.78%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
854.67%
Slight usage while NEM is negative at -167.12%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-85.24%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NEM at -208.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.23%
AP growth well above NEM's 164.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-3700.00%
Negative yoy usage while NEM is 41.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-95.51%
Negative yoy while NEM is 21.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
22.62%
Some CFO growth while NEM is negative at -29.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
99.88%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -13.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-117.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -107.32%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
99.43%
We have mild expansions while NEM is negative at -51.87%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
91.50%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x NEM's 62.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.