PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-278.54%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 92.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.05%
Negative yoy D&A while NEM is 19.93%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-3917.69%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NEM stands at 18.84%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
23.10%
SBC growth while NEM is negative at -10.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-85.13%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NEM is 158.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
114.34%
AR growth well above NEM's 223.13%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-134.90%
Both negative yoy AP, with NEM at -84.72%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
157.26%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -7.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
192612.50%
Some yoy increase while NEM is negative at -117.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-8.92%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 84.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
49.09%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -4.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-6.92%
We reduce yoy other investing while NEM is 1466.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
5.10%
We have mild expansions while NEM is negative at -242.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
20.00%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of NEM's 28.95%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.