PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
124.21%
Net income growth similar to NEM's 137.71%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
4.94%
Some D&A expansion while NEM is negative at -6.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
68.61%
Well above NEM's 45.71% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
58.28%
SBC growth while NEM is negative at -15.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-322.37%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NEM is 23.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-189.44%
AR is negative yoy while NEM is 68.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-637.34%
Both negative yoy AP, with NEM at -510.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-204.46%
Negative yoy usage while NEM is 57.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-99.59%
Both negative yoy, with NEM at -89.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-14.72%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 91.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
99.97%
CapEx growth well above NEM's 35.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.73%
We have some outflow growth while NEM is negative at -97.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
99.90%
Investing outflow well above NEM's 71.47%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-352.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -24850.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-332.68%
We cut yoy buybacks while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.