PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.16%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -54.07%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.22%
Some D&A expansion while NEM is negative at -2.48%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
262.53%
Well above NEM's 88.24% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-125.20%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 31.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
77.19%
Well above NEM's 67.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-314.48%
AR is negative yoy while NEM is 211.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.47%
AP growth well above NEM's 116.39%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-244.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-132.63%
Negative yoy while NEM is 280.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
18.03%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of NEM's 48.85%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-648.91%
Negative yoy CapEx while NEM is 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.99%
Growth of 92.99% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-125.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -164.86%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-600.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while NEM is 99.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to NEM's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.