95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
37.61%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -327.42%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.54%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with NEM at -18.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-332.84%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
290.50%
SBC growth while NEM is negative at -19.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
581.84%
Slight usage while NEM is negative at -448.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
190.63%
AR growth while NEM is negative at -455.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.46%
Negative yoy AP while NEM is 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
140.55%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -41.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
315.58%
Well above NEM's 596.35%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
20.34%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x NEM's 9.91%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-38886.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while NEM is 18.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-132.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -2900.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-38037.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -1.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
78.80%
We repay more while NEM is negative at -13700.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.