95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
463.45%
Net income growth above 1.5x NEM's 110.04%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-27.57%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with NEM at -10.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
187.12%
Well above NEM's 354.55% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
125.06%
SBC growth of 125.06% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-173.43%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -201.72%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-104.09%
AR is negative yoy while NEM is 56.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-164.98%
Both negative yoy AP, with NEM at -195.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-92.04%
Negative yoy usage while NEM is 31.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-101.27%
Both negative yoy, with NEM at -91.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-31.36%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with NEM at -41.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
59.68%
CapEx growth well above NEM's 40.20%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1018.69%
Growth of 1018.69% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
104.55%
We have mild expansions while NEM is negative at -125.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
15.13%
Debt repayment well below NEM's 99.81%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.