95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 23.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.47%
D&A growth well above NEM's 6.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
65.98%
Well above NEM's 5.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.72%
Both cut yoy SBC, with NEM at -5.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
93.25%
Well above NEM's 116.25% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-315.69%
AR is negative yoy while NEM is 3125.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.20%
Lower AP growth vs. NEM's 750.00%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
48.86%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -436.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-415.73%
Negative yoy while NEM is 8.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.56%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of NEM's 30.23%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
66.67%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -6.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-494.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while NEM is 98.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-231.25%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 36.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
10.81%
We repay more while NEM is negative at -28700.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.