95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.41%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 49.55%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.89%
Some D&A expansion while NEM is negative at -7.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
344.84%
Some yoy growth while NEM is negative at -34.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
12.15%
SBC growth of 12.15% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
140.47%
Slight usage while NEM is negative at -73.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
496.51%
AR growth well above NEM's 466.67%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.63%
Growth well above NEM's 47.37%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-162.28%
Both negative yoy, with NEM at -19800.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
34.67%
Some CFO growth while NEM is negative at -22.32%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
50.79%
CapEx growth well above NEM's 23.72%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while NEM is negative at -12.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while NEM is 3200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
97.55%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. NEM's 6522.22%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
90.40%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. NEM's 374.57%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-14.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -68.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.