PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 21.66%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.33%
Negative yoy D&A while NEM is 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-14030.23%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-87.74%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.76%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NEM is 45.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
134.82%
AR growth while NEM is negative at -11.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -41.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-202.13%
Negative yoy while NEM is 63.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-8.83%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 5.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
64.30%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -34.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
129.23%
We have some liquidation growth while NEM is negative at -94.29%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
69.70%
Growth well above NEM's 123.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
200.22%
We have mild expansions while NEM is negative at -21.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-91.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -6.25%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.