PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.04%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -26.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
17.29%
Some D&A expansion while NEM is negative at -10.08%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
91.74%
Well above NEM's 83.33% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
24.90%
SBC growth of 24.90% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-12.94%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -232.65%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-114.95%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NEM at -153.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.53%
Negative yoy usage while NEM is 38.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
111.65%
Some yoy increase while NEM is negative at -67.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
11.63%
Some CFO growth while NEM is negative at -50.12%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-54981.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -0.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
We reduce yoy sales while NEM is 3000.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-21.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -105.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-138.31%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 14.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
33.32%
We repay more while NEM is negative at -5.88%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.