PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.54%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 16.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.18%
Less D&A growth vs. NEM's 1.45%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-76.49%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NEM stands at 256.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-649.14%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 23.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-295.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NEM is 18.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3131.59%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NEM at -71.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.24%
AP growth well above NEM's 154.65%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-1616.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -57.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-919.60%
Both negative yoy, with NEM at -117.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-6.78%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 18.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
58.29%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -4.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -200.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-101.56%
Both yoy lines are negative, with NEM at -64.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-188.06%
We reduce yoy other investing while NEM is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-56.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -122.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.91%
We repay more while NEM is negative at -3055.56%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-86.06%
Negative yoy issuance while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.