PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with NEM at -139.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-21.66%
Negative yoy D&A while NEM is 1.60%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
148.87%
Some yoy growth while NEM is negative at -161.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
146.24%
SBC growth while NEM is negative at -19.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
156.82%
Well above NEM's 104.89% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
137.26%
AR growth well above NEM's 147.12%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.44%
A yoy AP increase while NEM is negative at -85.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
202.40%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -30.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
166.77%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. NEM's 7572.73%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-6.99%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 14.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
97.21%
CapEx growth well above NEM's 4.10%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while NEM stands at 83.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
138.24%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x NEM's 4.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
84.20%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. NEM's 2800.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
89.72%
Investing outflow well above NEM's 49.81%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-13.29%
We cut debt repayment yoy while NEM is 96.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-68.20%
Negative yoy issuance while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.