PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
116.27%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -200.79%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.88%
D&A growth well above NEM's 12.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
58.43%
Some yoy growth while NEM is negative at -312.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
33.34%
SBC growth of 33.34% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-161.59%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NEM is 184.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-146.54%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NEM at -102.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.51%
Negative yoy AP while NEM is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-182.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -48.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-8516.17%
Negative yoy while NEM is 78.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-2.98%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 13.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-16744.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -10.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.10%
Some yoy expansion while NEM is negative at -1950.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
2516.86%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x NEM's 278.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
144.26%
Growth well above NEM's 175.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-4026.39%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 10.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-0.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -4627.78%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
932.90%
Issuance growth of 932.90% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.