PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.44%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with NEM at -752.89%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-4.62%
Negative yoy D&A while NEM is 12.40%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-203.03%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9953.49%
SBC growth while NEM is negative at -5.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
14.17%
Less working capital growth vs. NEM's 90.65%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-1.54%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NEM at -245.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
388.85%
Inventory growth well above NEM's 87.13%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-14.78%
Negative yoy AP while NEM is 1766.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-37.48%
Negative yoy usage while NEM is 121.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
57.18%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. NEM's 2965.67%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
11.35%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of NEM's 113.53%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
283.86%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -22.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.73%
Purchases well above NEM's 58.14%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.14%
We reduce yoy other investing while NEM is 240.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
284.00%
Investing outflow well above NEM's 40.64%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
1.99%
Debt repayment growth of 1.99% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
4483.93%
We slightly raise equity while NEM is negative at -5.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-4483.93%
We cut yoy buybacks while NEM is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.