PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.74%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -2032.52%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
55.61%
Less D&A growth vs. NEM's 287.29%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-167.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
50.53%
SBC growth well above NEM's 37.50%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
680.22%
Slight usage while NEM is negative at -234.65%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
109.57%
AR growth while NEM is negative at -565.79%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-364.99%
Negative yoy inventory while NEM is 3900.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-41.31%
Both negative yoy AP, with NEM at -155.79%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
2108.31%
Growth well above NEM's 521.25%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-644.39%
Negative yoy while NEM is 795.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.21%
Some CFO growth while NEM is negative at -38.58%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-396.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -52.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-152781.91%
Negative yoy acquisition while NEM stands at 2788.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
12.62%
Some yoy expansion while NEM is negative at -700.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
35189753.73%
We have some liquidation growth while NEM is negative at -92.35%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-165.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -300.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-379.21%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 13.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
15.38%
We repay more while NEM is negative at -18.75%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
2091.46%
Issuance growth of 2091.46% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
267.80%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x NEM's 50.00%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.