95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x NEM's 10.26%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.54%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NEM stands at 107.37%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
54.27%
SBC growth of 54.27% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
177.43%
Well above NEM's 20.53% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
93.29%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. NEM's 260.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while NEM is 315.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
393.87%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -1036.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2.19%
Some yoy increase while NEM is negative at -86.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
8.76%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of NEM's 18.22%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
32.51%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -9.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with NEM at -42.06%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
13.54%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. NEM's 878.57%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-123.72%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 7.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1.36%
We cut debt repayment yoy while NEM is 37.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.