95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.05%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 73.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
104.09%
D&A growth well above PAAS's 1.22%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. PAAS's 3477.08%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-24.94%
Negative yoy SBC while PAAS is 40.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-260.68%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -1122.82%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Negative yoy while PAAS is 840.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.55%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PAAS's 15.81%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-16656.97%
Negative yoy CapEx while PAAS is 70.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -82.93%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-16197.05%
We reduce yoy invests while PAAS stands at 47.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to PAAS's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.