PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.33%
Some net income increase while PAAS is negative at -4.48%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.29%
D&A growth well above PAAS's 13.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-342.07%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-35.10%
Negative yoy SBC while PAAS is 9.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
12.04%
Less working capital growth vs. PAAS's 105.46%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth while PAAS is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while PAAS is negative at -248.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while PAAS is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while PAAS is 141.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.91%
Well above PAAS's 155.11%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
16.30%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PAAS's 4.58%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while PAAS is negative at -44.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1640.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5926.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -460.62%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1645.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -141.28%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.