95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.19%
Net income growth similar to PAAS's 22.88%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
25.94%
D&A growth well above PAAS's 5.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
189.32%
Some yoy growth while PAAS is negative at -16.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
44.54%
SBC growth while PAAS is negative at -3.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
78.15%
Well above PAAS's 33.27% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
19.73%
AR growth of 19.73% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
96.72%
Inventory growth well above PAAS's 17.26%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
12.50%
AP growth of 12.50% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-169.29%
Negative yoy usage while PAAS is 90.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
3888.06%
Well above PAAS's 155.99%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
32.30%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PAAS's 75.11%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
85.96%
Some CapEx rise while PAAS is negative at -125.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-212.50%
We reduce yoy other investing while PAAS is 87.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-165.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -13.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.